Sexuality

As I read the Sexuality part of Freud's theory I found it really interesting. I do not agree when he says, "..the sex drive is the most powerful drive in humans." I do, however, agree when he says "people varied in sexual drives." In some people their sexual drives are the strongest and only thing keeping them going. Other people, may have other drives that push them harder than their sexual drive; some people have no drive at all. With sexuality, people need to learn how to control their urges. Freud says " For some, the drive is so strong that they cannot sublimate all of its impulses in socially useful action...some of there people...act out in unsocial behavior." I agree with this statement; there are those who cannot control the sexual urges they feel. These people never learned delayed gratification and they act out on the people around them. These people are rapists, nymphomaniacs, promiscuous people, etc.
Another thing I found interesting about this part of the chapter are the different stages he describes that children go through. I remember studying the different stages in psychology. Reading this I remember that the oral stage is a critical part of child development. It is during this stage that the baby does connect with its mother (both physically and emotionally). Weening a baby early does scar it and results in an unstable adult. So, maybe I was right in a previous post I made; nurture does play a bigger part than nature. If a child is in the oral stage and is weened too early and too late , that helps lay the foundation as to what type of person it is going to be. Another thing I found interesting is the reason he gives as to why women become gay. They try to surface their masculinity in another way since they aren't able to grow a penis. As girls, as does every girl according to Freud, suffers from penis envy, it just seems that these women don't get over the envy and never reach the third and final stage. Freud was a brilliant philosopher; he had many interesting points in his theories.

Sweet Dreams

I began reading chapter 11 and I found what was said about dreams to be really interesting..."he argued that dreams are a form of wish suitably interpreted, reveal deep desires and secrets locked in the unconscious." I believe that this statement is true, things we feel and want to do in real life are acted out in our dreams sometimes. I also believe that dreams are not to be taken literally. Sometimes, like stories, there is symbolism in dreams. With my Caribbean background when someone dreams a particular thing it symbolizes something that is going to happen in real life (not all the time.) For example, we say that if you see clear water or a funeral in your dream, it means that its good fortune that is coming. If we see a wedding or dirty water in our dreams bad fortune is ahead. If we see fishes in our dream that mean someone is pregnant, if we see someone eating fish in our dream the person eating it is pregnant. It is a weird interpretation of dreams, I know but I grew up on ideas like these.
Dreams have been around for as long as the first man walked the earth. Dreams are there for us to take a glimpse into our subconscious. Dreams are also fragments of our memory. Whenever I watch a scary movie I always dream about the killer and myself being hunted down. Dreams also remember days conversations, like if you were talking about water all day , it just may happen that you dream about water. It also goes on feelings, if you are mad at someone you may have a dream that you are arguing with that person or even fighting that person. Dreams are also really random and you may wake up the next morning, like " Why did I dream about the tooth fairy and Santa Clause wrestling?" Dreams are universal, everyone has them. Everyone dreams, even if you wake up the next morning thinking you didn't. What puzzles me though, is how is it possible that when dreaming we can feel things? Like if I had a dream I fell I would feel it in my dream and wake up to find that I feel pressure on that particular spot. I guess that's just getting into the scientific aspect of things.

The Role of the Parent

Today a brief statement about parents were made and how they relate to children. While on this topic for a brief second, I pondered many questions about parent/ child relationships. For one thing is it possible (in the nature of mothers ) for mothers to despise/ hate/ envy their children. When I was in high school my teacher explained to the class that the reason why our mothers yell at their daughters for wearing "revealing clothing," is because mothers envy their children for their youth. Is that why we have so many restrictions when we are teenagers (especially girls) or is it just parental nurturing? Is it possible that secretly our mothers and our fathers hate the fact that we are young, vibrant and free and they are getting on in age?
Another thing that came to my mind is how much percent does nurture really play in a person's life. Maybe, for the beginning of a child's life the parent is able to mold the child into a "perfect citizen" and it is only when they are released into the world when they start to see choices that their parents hid from them. They then abandon principals, morals, and ethics they were grown with and let nature takes its course. Is it possible for a kid to be fully nurture or would a parent have to shield the kid from the outside world?

The Simple Life

No I am not talking about Nicole Richie's and Paris Hilton's show. I am talking about the subject that was briefly touched on in class. I do believe that the simple life, the road less traveled, is the happier life. It seems like nothing is kept simple anymore; weddings are now over 1.2 million dollars (and then the divorce 2 yrs later costs about the same), birthday parties for children are thousands of dollars, (even though they are not going to remember them, and the list goes on. Capitalists aren't happy people. They may have 30 cars or 12 mansions, but they are never able to be happy with these material things. I must say that I do admire the Amish people. They stay away from material things and don't let modern times and technology affect their way of living. When did the simple life get cut out and the life of capitalists get introduced? Was it the Industrial Revolution that started this greed and corruption or was it way before that?
Another thing is that I do not understand people who buy things for crazy amounts of money. Does the amount of money you spend make the product look better? What about those people who only have money for their basic needs, yet blows next months rent on a new Prada bag. Does knowing that you spent $500 on a bag make you feel better about the bag? Does it make you feel better about yourself? If I just spent five hundred big ones on a bag it would make me feel depressed and sick. Its like the more expensive something is, the more fascinating it becomes, and the more people strive to get it. I don't understand, is a bag not a bag whether it costs $5 or $500. Isn't the $500 bag going to eventually lose its thread and its straps. For the person who wears $200 dollar jeans, if you gain weight wouldn't the jeans stop fitting you like any other jeans pants would (even if its $12). It's puzzling and interesting to see how money is handled by people.

Religion

I must say that so far in this class religion and spirituality has come up a lot. In each chapter we read it seems that each philosopher has their own view on religion and how it connects with human nature. In chapter 10, Marx has strong feeling on the aspect of religion; he is against it which is why is labeled an atheist. Marx speaks of a revolution that would happen one day and how the lower class will take over the wealthy and create a utopia where everything is distributed equally. He then goes on to imply that in this new founded utopia there is no room for religion and it should be abolished. Then he says that religion oppresses people and that religion is an illusion to the happiness of man and only when it is abolished will man find real happiness. I feel that Marx , and others, speak of religion like its a physical thing like its something you can just get rid of and that it is there to make people miserable.
Religion is suppose to be something spiritual something you feel and then practice. It isn't something you see, touch or smell; it has no physical principles. Religion is a connection that you have spiritually with God, however this is just my opinion because I know everyone is entitled to their beliefs. Just the way Marx talks about religion is something that edges me the wrong way. When its abolished people will know true happiness and no longer be oppressed? How and why does religion become a burden?

Class Struggle

After reading chapter 10, I must say I agree with Marx on the topic of social class. It does make sense since the rich can identify with other rich people and the poor with other poor people. Though it makes sense for things to be this way, it doesn't make it right. For too long has there been a separation between the rich and the poor; it just seems like the economic gap is ever expanding. Since people do identify with their social class it is easy to have bad remarks about the other. The rich view lower class people as undeserving and lazy. Some probably believe that if lower class people wanted to be rich they could be and that they jut want rich people to take pity on them. Lower class people most likely view rich people as bullies and thieves, always pushing the little guy down and then kicking him where it hurts. Since I have been little I have always heard of the saying, the poor is getting poorer while the rich is getting richer. I have always wondered why is it that it seems money is depleting from mid to lower class people and the wealthy people can still afford to have 6 houses and three times as many cars.
Money is a big issue in the lives of humans. It is necessity to survive because everything relates back to monetary value. It just seems that this huge gap between classes is a struggle and has caused much evil in the world. In the bible it says the love of money is the root of all evil; though Marx was an atheist he eludes to this in this chapter. The wider the gap between the rich and the poor the more crimes happen. If there was a balance and no class system, and no label of rich or poor crime would if not cease be lowered. Marx makes some interesting points in this chapter.

The nature of knowledge and its components

What is knowledge exactly? Anyone can go to the dictionary and look up the meaning of it, but what is the essence of knowledge? IS it the capacity of how we understand things? The profound outlook we have on different topic? or is knowledge , like so many philosophers said, the ability to reason? When I first learned about knowledge in my existentialism course, my teacher explained to me that there are four components to knowledge. The first component of knowledge is called the I-inner. This is self-knowledge and is about knowing ones self. The next component is the You-inner. You-inner is your ability to empathize, ones ability to put oneself in the shoes of another person. This component is easy surpass because we are more aware of our I-inner.
The third component is the I-outer which is how people see you; the way you appear to other people. This is another area that is blind sighted because we think the way we see our self is the way others see us and are usually blind to the things we do that people notice, that we do not notice about ourselves. The last component is the You-outer which is the way we see the world; how we believe the world affects us even though we may not fully understand it and it is constantly changing.